Does anyone want to talk about how ridiculous it is that Valkyrie, of all people, shames Loki for not caring about doing the right thing?
Loki: I don’t mean to impose…
(Valkyrie throws a bottle at him because violence is only bad if The Villain™ does it)
Loki: The Grandmaster has a great many ships. I may even have stolen the access codes to his security system.
Valkyrie: And suddenly you’re overcome with an urge to do the right thing?You know… the same woman who spent half this movie also avoiding Thor’s attempts to gain her aid? The one who only decided to help out about five minutes prior to this scene? The one who arguably never would have wound up helping had Loki not invaded her memories, thus jolting her out of complacency? That Valkyrie?
Yeah, and considering her history in enslaving people for the Grandmaster runs about 1000 or so years? Maybe more, I can’t recall, she doesn’t really have the moral high ground.
In fact, Loki attempting to capture Thor and surrender him to the Grandmaster is more in line with something that Valkyrie would likely pursue (considering her time in Sakaar). Maybe they should have made her more difficult to convince.
Her comment/question is rather out of place also and would have to assume that she’s familiar with Loki to the level that Thor or Hulk (cause of NY) are.
I can only assume she said it in retaliation to what Loki did with her mind, but, in my opinion, she probably would have said something else.
Or they could have validated that she wasn’t necessarily trustworthy too.
It just felt like more of Taika’s lazy story-telling to me, as opposed to Valkyrie getting back at him for the whole ‘invading my mind’ thing. (But hey, don’t invade people’s brains, kids. It’s quite rude). I personally viewed it more as like, “hey, we haven’t reminded people that Loki’s a bad egg in the last 3 minutes or so; better let someone have a dig at his loose morals” sort of BS that is honestly just rampant in Thor: Ragnarok.
Like, I know Ragnarok critics get labelled conspiracy theorists for thinking (or at least speaking as though) Taika just had it out for Loki and wanted to degrade him as much as possible. And I get it, that sounds objectively insane. But just, looking at the narrative of the film itself, it’s… hard not to get that impression? And there’s really no other indicator in that movie–unless I’m forgetting something–that anyone on Sakaar (not including Thor and Bruce, obviously) has a clue who Loki really is. I guess it’s possible that they do, but there’s no evidence that that’s the case. More show & tell problems in this film.
I actually do want to address the ‘betraying Thor for money’ thing, though. Because I see a lot of people complaining that it’s completely out of character for Loki to do so for the money, and I actually have a different take on it. We all know Loki is rarely able to just be honest about what’s going on in his head. That’s essentially what the entire conflict between him and Thor has been fueled by for all this time, really. So I kind of headcanon that Loki might have told Thor that it was for the money, but I personally believe that in reality, it was actually Loki’s last-ditch effort to save his brother. Even as strong as he and Thor both are, individually and together, he did not believe Hela was an enemy that they could defeat (which is technically true)–especially now that she’s all cozy on Asgard, where she’ll be even stronger than when they first met her. Loki already failed once to talk Thor into staying on Sakaar of his own free will; I think betraying him was Loki’s way of trying to keep him safe from Hela by any means necessary.
I also think that deceptiveness can extend to his fight with Valkyrie too. A lot of Loki fans complain about her being able to take him captive so easily, but I choose to believe he lost to her intentionally. Easy ticket to finding his brother. He is the trickster god. Why are we suddenly taking him at face value all the time?
Admittedly, when it comes to Thor: Ragnarok, it’s super hard to decide when Loki is acting out of character because he’s running a scheme and when he’s doing it because of bad writing.
People actually call Loki stans (the true Loki stans) and people who don’t like Ragnarok as idiots just ‘cause we analyzed the movie from start to finish. Most of these people who insult us are new to the fandom and only saw Ragnarok. And even if they saw the other Thor movies they don’t remember it or for some reason they don’t like it. They just here for the jokes and, me, who is someone who’s here for depth of character, good storytelling and just pure emotion cannot deal with people like that.
Valkyrie is a good character but i wish people wouldn’t forget that she has done more wrong than Loki. She’s captured slaves for the Grandmaster for centuries. But of course she’s a hero like Thor and can do no wrong. Also people keep forgetting that the Grandmaster himself is a despot and a tyrant who has no mercy or respect for life. But you know he talks funny and so its all okay.
You know… the same woman who spent half this movie also avoiding Thor’s attempts to gain her aid? The one who only decided to help out about five minutes prior to this scene? The one who arguably never would have wound up helping had Loki not invaded her memories, thus jolting her out of complacency? That Valkyrie?
In fact, Valkyrie’s own words about “
suddenly you’re overcome with an urge to do the right thing?
“ itself applies accurately to what Valkyrie was doing exactly at that time.
And to be honest, Valkyrie is a hypocrite. Considering about her own deeds that sold many non-guilty people into slavery and causing those people’s deaths for thousands years, and the fact that she knows almost nothing about Loki himself, she has absolutely no right to judge Loki and then acts like she has never done anything wrong in her life, ever.
Valkyrie is a good character but i wish people wouldn’t forget that she has done more wrong than Loki. She’s captured slaves for the Grandmaster for centuries. But of course she’s a hero like Thor and can do no wrong. Also people keep forgetting that the Grandmaster himself is a despot and a tyrant who has no mercy or respect for life. But you know he talks funny and so its all 🆗.
People often forget about her actions because the narrative never call it. The narrative of Ragnarok want to condemn Loki only out of other characters and exaggerating his “evilness” into stereotype and caricature-like so people start to regard him as only “a mere background character who is just an useless twink who have no dignity and just nothing but a pest to Thor the Perfect ‘Hero’ with no absolute importance other than being fan-service”. That’s why they’re so many double standards in Ragnarok especially regarding Loki.
Waititi did have it in for Loki, he admitted it. He said Loki’s treatment and humiliation was “payback” for overshadowing the other movies. Everything, from that stupid play, to the deleted port o potty scene, to being chained up and having glass bottles thrown at his head, to Thor’s triumphant obedience disc scene was all a reflection of exactly how Waititi feels about Loki. “Blah, blah, blah, shut up, space orphan” “Loki tries so hard to be this tortured, artistic, space orphan”. Waititi’s not subtle about it. He thinks all the little Loki lovers are idiots. He meant out to “respectfully” disrespect the other movies, and extend a middle finger to those of us whose favorite character wasn’t Thor. It’s funny how, in that scene where Loki is sitting there chained up, nobody there, not Thor, not Bruce or Valkyrie, have any right to stand there and judge Loki. Valkyrie was just as much a “lackey” of the Grandmaster, if not moreso, because she worked for him and enslaved people for him for a long, long, time. She knew about the orgy ship too, and was obviously in high favor with the grandmaster. But yet in that scene, suddenly Thor, Bruce and Valkyrie are the spotless heroes with the right to look down their noses at Loki? No.
What I also find bothersome about Lokis treatment in Ragnarok is wondering how Tom took it. No one knows really and we may never, yet I can’t help but think it affected him negatively on some level, after devoting so much time, talent and heart into the character. I’d certainly be insulted and secretly pissed. And yes, Sakaar must’ve dwelled within the boonies of space, as I too found it odd no one there ever recognized Loki. A form of subliminal messaging, perhaps?
Let us not forget please that Taika is not completely to blame. Hemsworth specifically asked for Taika because he was mad about how Tom overshadowed him in TDW because he did a shitty job and was tired of playing Thor like how it was written. Hemsy requested Taika. Which might be why Tom and Hemsworth aren’t tight anymore.
Thanks for @ing me ❤ this stuff means a lot to me and I keep somehow missing out on these newer conversations.
I’ve said a whole lot about this before actually, which I won’t rehash, save to say maybe take a gander at my Ragnarok critical and meta tags and perhaps in particular my post about why I disliked Infinity War LESS than I disliked Ragnarok, specifically, in terms of how Loki was written.
A couple of outstanding points that I’d like to compliment, however:
–The notion that Loki was trying to save Thor’s life by obstructing Thor from leaving Sakaar, while pretending that it was about money, is one that I find is indeed a rare bit of in-character behavior from a Waititi!Loki. I would even go so far as to say that Loki is not entirely aware himself that this is his own deeper motive. He is forever acting counter to his tendency to protect his brother, not because he doesn’t love Thor, but because Loki tries to abide by a code of self-preservation, and protecting Thor so often runs counter to that goal. So well thought out point there, @nikkoliferous
–Like @darthwindows, I’ve also had a lower opinion of Chris Hemsworth since reading his interviews, which come across as self-absorbed and immature, when Tom Hiddleston (who is actually older and has much more extensive film and stage credentials) took him under his wing when he was new to the industry, to actively seek a way to make Loki seem a weaker character in order to prop up Thor. Any time you weaken a strong character to strengthen a weak character, it shows that you are an inferior writer. And “revamping” Thor by making him a flippant, entitled asshole who coerced not only Loki, but also Valkyrie and especially Bruce, with charm, is not only a perversion of the character, but a REGRESSION that effectively erases an attempt at character development over four previous films (Thor 1, TDW, Avengers 1, and Avengers 2). Then tellingly, Chris complained about the return of Thor to “old Thor” in Infinity War, when frankly Infinity War Thor struck me as way more sympathetic. I think it’s sad that Chris effectively damaged, by neglect, Tom’s many years of labor on a breakthrough role in order to cope with feelings of insecurity about his own performance. Amusingly, I think in the long run that’s backfired; Loki is more popular than ever, albeit for reasons that don’t always coincide with the Loki “Stan” motives.
– @lokiloveforever Yes you have it right on the money, Waititi absolutely dislikes Loki. For whatever reason he has an axe to grind with the character. His background is that of a socially and politically liberal person of color and that has been an asset in the work that he has directed and written; people have even written on how his Maori heritage is uniquely and usefully counter-authority and that his sense of humor is excellent in dismantling colonialist ideas of power structure. THAT SAID? In this case, for some reason, he has misapprehended Loki as a whiny privileged white boy who imagines up all of his problems, rather than what he has always been in both the films and the comics: coded as Other in many ways that the audience can vibrantly relate to (queer; a person of color–yes, I do think the Jotnar are a metaphor for what an imperialist Asgard sees as a subaltern or “lesser” race, which makes the “my blue baby” play especially repugnant; the victim of bullying; and mentally ill from trauma). It’s almost like because Tom is white, affluent, and handsome, Waititi thinks the character leads an equally blessed life (which is hilariously ironic given how people like Waititi tell “Loki fangirls” that they only like Loki because Tom is an attractive straight-coded man :))) ).
–I think Valkyrie is an important character for her bi and POC representation, but this does not make her above reproach, and it shouldn’t. That said I’m not sure that when she accused Loki of hypocrisy she was saying she was not also a hypocrite; I read it more as “I know you, you’re an asshole like me.” Even so, yeah, she’s really not in a position to talk, and throwing solid breakable objects at him for simply being helpful made her less than sympathetic to me in that particular scene. But like OP says, “if the heroes are doing it, it’s excusable,” including, apparently, emotional coercion and violence (don’t even get me started on the punishment disc Thor left on Loki causing him to writhe in agony for hours: Waititi also has very little regard for people with PTSD, apparently).



















































